Wednesday, December 29, 2010

The Concurrence of the Senate


Felix Grundy was US Attorney General from 1838 to 1839. In 1804, he was a member of the Kentucky House of Representatives. He also served on the committee which oversaw Polly's case, and delivered same to the Senate for their concurrence.

Day 2 in the musty journal of the Kentucky Legislature. Well, it would be musty if it hadn't been on microprint. I didn't learn anything new, but in the interest of a complete accounting, I submit for your concurrence the following records from the Kentucky Senate, 1804.

Journal of the Senate
of the Commonwealth of Kentucky,
At A General Assembly
Begun and held at the capitol in the town of Frankfort,
On Monday the Fifth Day of November, in the year
of our Lord one thousand, eight hundred and four,
and of the Commonwealth the thirteenth.
Being the fifth session of the General Assembly under the
present constitution of government.

Frankfort
from the press of William Hunter
Printer to the Commonwealth
1804


Wednesday, November 21, 1804, p30f
A message from the house of representatives by mr. Grundy;
Mr. Speaker,
The house of representatives have passed a bill entitled "an act for the relief of Polly McNeff," so which they desire the concurrence of the senate. And then he withdrew.
... and the said bills, being severally read the first time, were ordered to be read a second.

Thursday, November 22, 1804, p32
A bill from the house of representatives entitled "an act for the relief of Polly McNeff;" and a bill entitled "an act for the conditional divorce of Rachel Branham;" were severally read and referred to a select committee of mr. Lancaster, mr. Henderson, mr. Hughes, mr. Ewing, mr. Pemberton, and mr. Thompson.

Tuesday, November 27, 1804, p44
Mr. Lancaster from the select committee to whom was referred the following bills, viz. A bill from the house of representatives entitled "an act for the relief of Polly McNeff;" and a bill entitled "an act for the conditional divorce of Rachel Branham," now reported on the same without amendments.
Ordered, That the first bill be recommitted to the further consideration of the same committee; and the second bill be laid on the table.

Wednesday, November 28, 1804, p46
Mr. Lancaster from the committee to whom the bill from the house of representatives was recommitted, entitled "an act for the relief of Polly McNeff;" reported the same with some amendments, which being severally twice read were agreed to. The said bill with the amendments was read the third time.
Resolved, That the same do pass with the amendments and that the title be "an act for the relief of Polly McNeff."
Ordered, That the clerk do acquaint the house of representatives and request their concurrence to the said amendments.

Tuesday, December 28, 2010

Ordered, that Miss Clark read the Journal of the House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of Kentucky, 1804

Christopher Greenup was Governor of the Commonwealth of Kentucky from September of 1804 to September of 1808. On December 6, 1804, he signed "An act for the relief of Polly McNeff"

Over Thanksgiving vacation, I found a journal article called "The Myth of the Abandoned Wife: Married Women's Agency and the Legal Narrative of Gender in Eighteenth-Century Kentucky" by Honor R. Sachs. It's an interesting piece, and essentially argues that regardless of the circumstances under which a marriage disintegrated in late 18th and early 19th centuries in Kentucky, the lawmakers that approved legislative divorces had a certain set of expectations. Marriages didn't fail because a woman wanted to leave her husband or make her own way in the world. They failed because these poor women were abandoned by their way-ward husbands. So, that's the grounds on which most divorces were based.

It was interesting - but I was looking for instructions. I got them. The article included an explanation of the legislative process that divorces underwent. I learned that each of these were debated in the legislative bodies, and that there are references to them in the Journals of the legislature.

Can they be entirely believed? Maybe not, but finding references to Polly's suit would certainly shed light on the situation. Much to my surprise, the University of Utah library has the records. They're found on an archaic medium - and it took me three library trips to finally access the information. But I did it. I now submit for your approval, dear reader, the results of my evening's perusal.

***********

Journal of the House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of Kentucky
Begun and held at the capitol in the town of Frankfort, on Monday the Fifth of November, in the year of our Lord One Thousand, Eight Hundred and Four and of the Commonwealth the Thirteenth.
Frankfort, From the Press of William Hunter, Printer to the Commonwealth, 1804.

Friday, November 9, 1804, p. 18
Also a petition from Polly McNeff, praying that a law may pass, granting her a divorce from her husband, John T. McNeff; were presented and read, and ordered to be referred to the committee of religion.

Wednesday, November 14, 1804, p26
Mr. Russell from the committee of religion, made the following report viz.
The committee of religion have according to order had under consideration the petition of Polly McNeff, to them referred, and come to the following resolution thereupon to wit:
Resolved, as the opinion of this committee, that the said petition, setting forth that the said Polly did some years past, intermarry with John T. McNeff, who about two years past left the said Polly with three small children, without the smallest means of support; that the said Polly by industry, has procured a bare and scanty maintenance for herself and children, and is apprehensive that the said John will return and take that little earning from her, and praying that she may be divorced from the said John T. McNeff - is reasonable.
Which, being twice read, was concurred in.

Monday, November 19, 1804, p40
"A bill for the relief of Polly McNeff;" was read a second time, and committed to a select committee of messrs. F Grundy, Watkins, Spaulding, and J Grundy.

Tuesday, November 20, 1804, p42f
Mr. F. Grundy from the select committee to whom was referred "a bill for the relief of Polly McNeff, reported the same with an amendment, which being read, was agreed to by the house. The said bill with the amendment was ordered to be engrossed and read a third time tomorrow.

Wednesday, November 21, 1804, p47
The engrossed bills with the following titles, were severally read the third time viz "An act for the relief of Polly McNeff" ...
Resolved, That the said bills do pass, and the titles be as aforesaid.
Ordered, that mr. F. Grundy carry the first bill to the senate and desire their concurrence.

Wednesday, November 28, 1804, p67
A message from the Senate by mr. Lee their secretary;
Mr. Speaker,
The senate have passed a bill entitled "an act concerning attornies at law;" in which they desire the concurrence of this house. They have also passed the bills from the house with the following titles, to wit; "An act for the relief of Polly McNeff." And "an act for the relief of Rachel Branham;" with amendments, in which amendments they desire your concurrence. And then he withdrew.

Thursday, November 29, 1804, p69
The house then proceeded to consider the amendments proposed by the senate to the bills with the following titles, viz. An act for the relief of Polly McNeff. An act for the conditional divorce of Rachel Branham. And an act erecting sundry counties into election precincts; and the said amendments being severally read were concurred in.

Monday, December 3, 1804, p76
Mr. Kercheval from the joint committee of enrollments, reported that the committee had examined the enrolled bills with the following titles, viz. "an act for the relief of Polly McNeff;" and "an act giving Alvin Montjoy the further time of one year to erect a slope upon South Licking;" and that the same were truly enrolled. Whereupon the speaker affixed his signature thereto.

Friday, December 7, 1804, p84
A message from the Governor by mr. Gano:
Mr. Speaker,
The Governor has directed me to inform this house that he did on the 6th inst. approve & sign the enrolled bills with the following titles, viz. "an act for the relief of Polly McNeff;" "giving Alvin Montjoy the further time of one year to erect a slope upon South Licking;" "for the conditional divorce of Rachel Branham;" "erecting sundry counties into election precincts;" "for the relief of John Lewis;" "adding a small portion of Cumberland to Adair county." And he withdrew.

**********

And he withdrew. Did it solve anything for Polly? Make her sleep better at night? May I point out to those of you keeping count that it says she had *THREE* small children. (Let's hear it for Nancy McNiff Chamberlain! Daughter?)

With most discoveries, this increases my "to-do" list. Next up, the journal of the Senate ...

Sunday, October 3, 2010

Polly's Brothers and Sisters

This all seems so hypothetical I haven't posted it anywhere - until today. I know Thomas Wright of Washington County, Kentucky signed Polly and John T's marriage bond. So, If I start with the assumption that Thomas was her father - this gives me a list of possible siblings:

Thomas Wright, Jr. m Mary Graham in Washington Co, KY, Aug 8, 1810
Harriet Wright m William Ramsey in Washington Co, KY, Jan 20, 1819
William Wright - who moved to Indiana ~1807 and who I assume brought bros. Thomas Wright McNeff and William McNeff to Indiana. William Wright m first around 1800 to unk and again ~1807 to Mary Inyard.
Andrew J. Wright, born around 1874 and married March 10, 1817 in Washington Co, KY to Mildred Ramsey.
Ann Wright m in Washington Co, KY on Aug 26, 1801 to Samuel Robertson

This information comes from Washington Co, Kentucky Bicentennial History, 1792-1992. Turner Publishing Co, Paducah KY p442.

Mainly, I'm typing this up so that if a researcher is googling last names, they may arrive here.

Always looking for answers ...

Sunday, March 28, 2010

Along the Boatman's Trail


"Old Natchez Trace" Photo by jimmywayne on flickr.com



I've got a new dream vacation. I want to hike the Natchez Trace. If by chance John T McNeff wasn't a rogue and a cad, he was an unlucky traveler on the Boatman's Trail from New Orleans.

In the early 19th century, it was common for farmers to build flatboats to take their crops to market in New Orleans. Abraham Lincoln, for example, made trips down the river in 1828 and 1831.

So if John T's trip had gone as Polly expected he would have floated the cattle (or horses, depending on the account you follow) down to New Orleans. It would have at least been himself and we'll say his slave - John T could have also sold him while there. Would someone else have come along? Maybe a Thompson cousin? (There was a Thompson family living in Springfield after all.) John T would have sold his goods, his flatboat - and if he was a bit of the faux dandy I imagine him to be, he would have bought himself a horse for the return trip. (Though it was frequently made on foot.) To head North, he would have have got on the Nashville Road - the Natchez Trace. From Nashville, The Wilderness Road would have taken him the rest of the way to Kentucky. Except we know he never made it.

Marauding gangs are common in these tales ... indeed they are the stuff of legend. The Harpes, Joseph Hare, Samuel Mason and John Murrell were among the famous. And it wasn't just robbery, there was sadistic cruelty. There are stories of disemboweling the bodies to fill them with weight and send them to the bottom of the river ... of signatures in the blood of their victims to make sure they got proper credit.

John T's bones could be resting in a watery grave - or forgotten deep along a shaded, well-worn path.

I'm sure it's the story that the family told itself to make sense of his never returning. Remember, David T McNeff's bio said that John T was "presumed dead." But Polly's divorce request still nags me. I think she knew more about the man than we'd like to remember.

  • Learn more about The Natchez Trace Parkway

  • Wednesday, January 6, 2010

    Who the Hey is Nancy??

    I spend a lot of time googling. More times than not - I end up right where I've been before. I guess you'd would call it "spinning my wheels." That is, until something like this happens.

    Thomas Wright McNeff and William McNeff were Polly's sons. They were both born in Kentucky - and moved to Indiana sometime before their marriages - both in 1824. William married Mary Chamberlain. Now usually, I'd stare at them on the "M" page of the index, but last week, I ended up on the "C" page. And there, just two entries under William and Mary was Samuel Chamberlain, who married Nancy McMiff.

    McMiff?

    Now I've seen records of my McNeffs spelled McNiff, McNaff, M'Neff ... and I know there are other variants out there. But apparently, McMiff is actually a name. But that close to my McNeff?

    I corresponded with the webmaster Barbara Ziegenmeyer, who researches McNeffs too. She found it as odd as I did. So, I headed down to the LDS Genealogy Library armed with a call number Barbara gave me.

    And there it said Nancy ... McNipp!?

    Frustrated, I pulled every film relevant to Harrison County, Indiana marriages. I stuck the first one of the 5 on the reader, and it was the original hand-written ledger.

    Yes my friends, it said Nancy McNiff. She married Samuel Chamberlain on Feb 1, 1821, 3 years before William married a Chamberlain.

    So who is she? I have no idea. Could she be a sister? John T and Polly married in 1798 and Thomas wasn't born until 1800 ... William 1805.

    Polly's usually a nickname ... could I finally have found a trace of her after the divorce?

    More questions than answers. More questions than answers.